|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"The
EPA publishes a reference dose (Rfd) for silver
which is an estimate of daily exposure to the entire population that is
unlikely to be associated with a
significant risk of adverse effects over a lifetime. The current
Rfd for oral silver exposure is 5
micrograms/kg/day with a critical dose estimated at 14
micrograms/kg/day... Based on this Rfd, a 150 pound adult should not exceed 350 micrograms/day."
Argyria is caused by the same mechanism that is used
when developing photographs.
It is the same thing. If you start with a salt of silver, and
expose it to light, some
of it will reduce to silver metal.
Then if you have a developer (caffeine is a good developer) in an alkaline solution (blood is normally
alkaline), additional silver
will plate out from the compound
onto the metallic particles, making them grow. That is the photographic process, and that
is how one gets argyria. Now,
the process requires silver salts. There are no substitutes. Colloidal silver contains
no silver salts. Basically silver salts are what are in
unexposed film. Silver colloid is what is in a developed photograph. If you put a developed photo into the sun what does it do. It fades,
it doesn't turn darker. That
is because a developed photo has no
silver salts to add to the silver particles since it is already nothing but reduced silver
particles. Thus colloidal silver cannot cause argyria. Theoretically I
guess one could take CS with sufficient ppm and in sufficient quantity
to cause aggregation, but one would likely drown from too much water first,
as the amounts would be truly phenomenal. In years of pouring over hardcopy
of obscure medical cases
no one has yet found a single report of any adverse reaction to very fine
particles of very fine silver floating in very pure water. please read both of the following letters, the first is the request and the second the FDA's response
U.S.
Department Of Health and Human Services Public
Health Service 5600
Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 Dear
Sirs/Madam, Pursuant
to the Freedom of Information Act and in regard your August 17th, 1999
ruling regarding colloidal silver, could you please supply the following
documentation on which you based your decision? 1.
The number of deaths related to the consumption of colloidal silver. 2.
The number of allergic reactions to the consumption of colloidal silver.
3.
The number of harmful drug interactions from both OTC and prescription
drugs when combined with colloidal silver. 4.
The number of reported cases of Argyria from colloidal silver made with
the AC or DC electrical process. 5.
The number of cases of Argyria from colloidal silver that did not contain
protein stabilizers. Thank
you for your time and consideration of this request. Sincerely,
Brent Finnegan The
FDA response: Public
Health Service Center
for Drug Evaluation and Research Office
of Training and Communication Freedom
of Information Staff HFD-205 5600
Fishers Lane 12 B 05 Rockville, Maryland 20857 DEPARTMENT
OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES November
3, 1999 In
Response Refer to File: F99-22589 Brent Finnigan Takoma (sic), WA 98408 Dear
Mr. Finnigan: This
is in response to your request of 10/14/99, in which you requested adverse events associated
with the use of Colloidal Silver. Your request was received in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
on 10/25/99. We have searched the records from FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) and have been
unable to locate any cases
that would be responsive to your request.
Charges
of $3.50 (Search $3.50, Review $0, Reproduction $0, Computer time $0)
will be included in a monthly invoice. DO NOT SEND ANY PAYMENT UNTIL YOU RECEIVE
AN INVOICE. If
there are any problems with this response, please notify us in writing
of your specific problem(s). Please
reference the above file number. Sincerely,
Hal
Stepper Freedom
of Information Technician Office
of Training and Communications Freedom of Information Staff, HFD-205
Quoting from Alexander G. Schauss, Ph.D. (John Hopkins University)
you
should be advised that we recently completed an extensive review of the
scientific literature on the afety (Safety?)of silver, especially as it
relates to its one known potential side effect, namely, Argyria. Argyia
is an irreversible discoloration of the pigment (skin) caused by excessive
silver intake or chronic exposure to silver by certain tissues. The amount
of silver required to develop Argyria is estimated to be 3.8 grams per
day. By comparison standard 10 ppm colloidal
silver contains silver in amounts equaling less than 1 milligram of silver
(1,000 micrograms = 1 milligram; 1,000 milligrams - 1 gram), which therefore
represents an amount approximately 1/500th to 1/1000th of the amount of
silver considered to be a risk in the development of Argyria. Most
cases of Argyria reported in the medical literature over the last 100
years involved chronic intravenous or intramuscular use of the silver
preparations, most often involving a silver drug prescribed by physicians
which in most cases contained silver nitrate. Other cases of Argyria reported
in the medical literature involve application of silver preparations used
for many months or years in the
treatment of the eye or vagina for certain diseases. We could not
locate a single case of orally consumed colloidal silver manufactured
in the last 25 years causing Argyria in our review of the literature.
This is probably due to the low levels of silver contained in such preparations,
since only very small amounts of silver are needed for its antiseptic
effect. Humans consume approximately 100 micrograms of silver every day
in the diet. Additional amounts within this range would be considered
safe by all reasonable estimates, especially if the amount needed to develop
Argyria would be equivalent of 380,000 micrograms (or 3.8 grams) of silver
a day. As
for the efficacy of silver preparations, we found considerable scientific
evidence published over the last 75 years that a number of silver compounds
can be effective germicidal (antiseptic) agents against several hundred
pathogenic organisms. However, silver is not termed an antibiotic as some
have claimed because an antibiotic by definition is derived from a living
organism. Sincerely,
Alexander
G. Schauss, Ph.D. Director,
Life Sciences Division John
Hopkins University Alexander
G. Schauss, Ph.D., is the Director of the Life Sciences Division of the
American Institute for Biosocial Research, Inc. in Tacoma, WA. He is a
member of the Government's Commission on Dietary Supplements. He
holds joint faculty positions as Associate Professor of Research and Senior
Director of esearch and Development at the Southwest College of Naturopathic
Medicine and Health Sciences, in Tempe, AZ. And, as Associate Professor
of Behavioral Sciences at the National College of Naturopathic
Medicine in Portland, OR. Dr.
Schauss is an Emeritus Member of the New York Academy of Sciences, former
Chairman of the Food Policy Council of the National Council for Public
Health Policy, Founding Member of the British Society of Nutritional Medicine,
Emeritus Executive Director of the American Preventive Medical Association,
Emeritus Executive Director and current President of Citizens for Health, and a member of the
American Public Health Association and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The
only negative effect reported by CS users is a phenomenon called the Herxheimer effect, named after doctor Karl Herxheimer
(who identified this phenomenon). Sometimes, when a person starts off
for the first time ingesting a large amount of CS, the CS is so efficient
at killing pathogens in the body that the body cannot adequately dispose
of the dead pathogens through the normal eliminative organs, and it resorts
to the secondary ones, the lungs, sinuses and skin. Or the CS user may
experience diarrhea, as the body tries to flush itself out. In that case,
one merely needs to reduce or temporarily stop the CS until the healing
crisis is over, and then start taking smaller amounts of CS. A new European
Union Drinking
Water Standard in draft form has removed any limitations on silver in
drinking water following the World Health Organizations Guidelines
for Drinking Water Quality which states, "It is unnecessary to recommend
any health-based guidelines for silver as it is not hazardous to human
health." According to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Poison Control
Center, CS is considered harmless. Dr.
Samuel Etris, a senior consultant at the Silver Institute, says there
has never been any allergenic, toxic or carcinogenic
reactions to CS. The U.S. Governments Center for Disease Control
confirmed that fact in 1995.
The
term Argyria describes the condition of a bluish gray
color of the skin, and Argyosis the bluing of the eye white, resulting
from the use of SILVER COMPOUNDS. To better understand the misconception
regarding Argyria, I will quote from the book "The Micro Silver
Bullet by Dr. M. Paul Farber 1996 page XII (ISBN 1-887742-00-X) In reference to a "Journal of American
Medical Association" article, October 18 1995, volume 274 # 15,
where cases of Argyria were cited to have
been caused by silver compounds (not colloidal silver, but silver
mixed with other metals), note: "These Case history resentations represent
biased and unprofessional writing. The author's apparent
inability to understand the difference between a silver nitrate,
sulfide, or other silver compound
demonstrates their lack of understanding of basic chemical properties.
The matrix, substrate, and particle size are all critical to the
varied functions and reactions with use of these products. That is why
there has not been a single case of Argyria from a properly manufactured
modern-day colloidal silver product.
The cases of Argyria reported in the 1920's and 1930's resulted because
the technology of the day was unable to produce a pure colloidal silver
product with a small enough particle size." Ref. (4-A)
The reported cases of Argyria usually involved very high and frequent
doses over extended periods of time of silver salts/compounds such as
silver sulfate, silver nitrate, silver chloride, etc. The
Environmental Protection Agency's Poison Control Center
reports no toxicity listing for Colloidal Silver; it is therefore considered
harmless in any concentration. However all of the silver salts are identified
as toxic, although the only adverse effect noted is Argyria. Therefore
the concern is with silver salts not Colloidal Silver. Dr John Hill D.C.
in his book Colloidal Silver, A Literature Review states this:
Critics of colloidal silver sometimes state that it has been known
to cause organ damage, kidney damage, pulmonary edema, atherosclerosis
and death. These claims appear to be based on a research study on
dogs in which the dogs were deliberately killed by extremely large lethal
doses of silver. At the doses given, any heavy metal and probably many
essential minerals like zinc, iron, copper, etc. would have produced death
in similar fashion." And again "We know that dogs died from injections
of a type of protein-bound silver in dosages ranging from 500 mg to 1.9
grams of silver depending on the frequency of administration. This was
equivalent in silver content to giving [per day] a 150 pound adult between
150 litres and 570 litres of 10 ppm colloidal silver, or between 75 and
285 liters of 20 ppm colloidal silver or between 50 and 190 litres of
30 ppm colloidal silver. The 10 gram estimated lethal dose for humans
from Goodman and Gillman is equivalent to 1000 liters of 10 ppm colloidal
silver." In another case an ndividual ingested an estimated 124 grams
of silver nitrate over a 9-year period. She developed argyria and an assortment
of neurological symptoms as well... This report is often used by critics
to attribute neurological disorders to silver consumption. They curiously
fail to put in perspective the gross difference between the quantities
of silver involved." He also reports: http://www.burnsurgery.org/Betaweb/Modules/silver/section1.htm
Authors:
Robert H. Demling, M.D. | Leslie DeSanti, RN |
Dennis P. Orgill, M.D. PhD. Silver
has been used for centuries to prevent and treat a variety of diseases,
most notably infections. It has been well documented that silver was used
in ancient Greece and Rome as a disinfectant for water and other liquid
storage. Silver coins were placed in the jars of liquid to maintain sterility.
The American Settlers
(1800s) routinely place a silver dollar in barrels of liquids to
avoid spoilage and more recently NASA has used silver to maintain water
purity on the space shuttle. The free silver ion or radicals are known
to be the active agents of anti-microbial silvers. Of interest is its
extremely potent antibacterial properties as only 1 part per 100 million
of elemental silver is effective in a solution. Silver ion kills micro-organisms
instantly by blocking the respiratory enzyme system (energy production)
while having no negative effect on human cells. In
1834 the German obstetrician F. Crede used a 1% silver nitrate solution
as eye drops in newborns, eliminating blindness caused by post partum
eye infections. Numerous studies in the early 1900s correlated low
plasma silver levels with infections, suggesting silver to be an essential
micromineral requiring replacement. Of significant importance is that
no known BACTERIAL RESISTANCE has developed to the silver ion as opposed
to current antibiotics. Charged silver solutions (electro-colloidal) were
approved in the 1920s by the FDA for use as an antibacterial agent.
In
addition to its recognized antibacterial properties silver solutions,
especially (electro-colloidal elemental silver) were reported to improve
the healing of "indolent wounds" and in the regeneration of damaged tissue
unrelated to its effects on infection. The description of decreased rubor
in wounds indicates an anti-inflammatory property of silver. Silver is
completely non-toxic to local tissues and painless upon application. This
response must be distinguished from the response of silver salts, many
of which are caustic to tissues, especially silver nitrate, due to the
potent oxidizing or cell damaging effects of nitrate or nitrite. Virtually
all of the reports on the use of the pure elemental silver to control
infection or to increase healing occurred prior to the 1940s after which antibiotics
became prevalent, decreasing the use of silver (except in burns). With
the recent introduction of a pure silver delivery system for use in burns
and wounds, new data is being obtained which verifies these historical
concepts. Silver was commonly worn in the Greco-Roman period because of
its perceived qualities of "maintaining health". Section
II. WHAT
ARE THE BIOLOGIC PROPERTIES OF SILVER RELATED TO WOUND INFECTION CONTROL
AND HEALING? (THE FACTS ABOUT SILVER) Silver
has long been known to be a potent antimicrobial agent and its beneficial
effects on wound biology have in general been overlooked until recently.
A description of what silver does and its role in wound management will
be presented briefly with a more complete discussion in later sections.
ANTIMICROBIAL
PROPERTIES: The
antimicrobial activity of silver ion is well defined. Silver ion rapidly
kills microbes by blocking the cell respiration pathway. The speed of
action is almost instantaneous once the silver reaches the microbe. The
efficacy of microbe killing is based not only on the amount of silver
ion present, but likely also the presence of other silver radicals generated
by a silver releasing product. Because of mechanism of action, microbial
resistance to silver itself has not been reported. In addition, silver
has repeatedly been shown to be non-toxic to human cells. Toxicity occurs
from the complexes used to deliver silver such as nitrate and sulfadiazine.
Section
IV IS
SILVER TOXIC TO HUMAN TISSUE? There
are two well-described (but often inappropriately interchangeable) forms
of silver toxicity. One is due to silver itself and the second more severe
complication is due to the attached compound. SILVER
ION TOXICITY (Systemic)
Although
absorbed silver interacts with other metals and tissue proteins, these
interactions do not appear to be harmful with the exception of the skin
discoloration known as ARGYRIA, a cosmetic problem. Argyria is a process
of silver granule deposition in skin leading to a permanent blue/gray
discoloration. There is no tissue injury. The effect is a cosmetic problem.
The most common causes were not from medicinal use of silver but rather
the constant exposure to silver either as a chemist, silver miner or long
term use of silver cups, plates, etc. Of interest is the fact that the
term "blue blood" used to describe Royalty came from the finding of mild
argyria in European nobility from the constant use of silver place setting,
silverware, and silver cups, along with the frequent ingestion of ground-up
silver metal powder (used as a microbial medicine), leading to a bluish
skin color. Silver granules can be found in all organs including the skin
indicating that the silver aggregates are not cleared. It would therefore
appear that any form of silver if given in large quantity can be a causative
factor (at least 10 grams needs to be absorbed). Silver
itself has been shown to be harmless to normal human tissue. The toxicity
results from the salt or complexes that are used to deliver the silver.
A pure silver delivery would be the ideal approach to avoid local toxicity.
(J Burn Care Rehabilitation 1999;20:195-200) Link to Colloidal Silver Online database http://silverdata.20m.com/fda.html
featuring fresh-made Remedies Designed Exclusively For You ! Our liquid extracts are the most potent form of a botanical elixir.
free health questionnaire. file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Edward%20Kasper/Desktop/web%2008/Documents%20and%20Settings/Edward%20Kasper/Desktop/web%20082402/index.html |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |